PENGGUNAAN METODE STAD UNTUK MENINGKATKAN HASIL BELAJAR SISWA KELAS X IPA 2 PADA MATERI KEANEKARAGAMAN HAYATI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33143/jes.v8i1.1975Abstract
Penelitian ini dilakukan di SMA Negeri 1 Jaya dari bulan Juli sampai September 2021 bertujuan untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa dengan penggunaan Metode Students Teams Achievement Divisions (STAD) pada materi Keanekaragaman Hayati siswa kelas X IPA 2 SMA Negeri 1 Jaya. Penelitian yang dilakukan dalam2 siklus dengan subyek penelitian siswa kelas X IPA 2 SMA Negeri 1 Jaya tahun pelajaran 2021/ 2022 sebanyak 26 siswa. Analisis data menggunakan teknik analisis deskriptif komparatif dengan membandingkan kondisi awal dengan hasil yang dicapai pada setiap siklus, dan analisis deskriptif kualitatif hasil observasi dengan membandingkan hasil observasi pada siklus I dan siklus II. Melalui penggunaan Metode STAD pada materi Keanekaragaman Hayati mata pelajaran biologi bagi siswa kelas X IPA 2 SMA Negeri 1 Jaya diperoleh hasil tes pada siklus I dengan persentase ketuntasan 53,8 % dengan nilai rata-rata kelas 72,7 dan meningkat pada hasil tes siklus II  92,3 % dengan nilai rata-rata kelas 90. Pada kedua siklus ini perubahan nilai yang signifikan bila dibandingkan dengan pra siklus dengan ketuntasan belajar yang hanya mencapai 30,8% dan nilai rata-rata 62,4. Dengan demikian penggunaan Metode STAD dapat meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa pada materi keanekaragaman hayati bagi siswa kelas X IPA 2 SMA Negeri 1 Jaya.
Kata Kunci: Cooperative Learning tipe STAD, partisipasi, hasil belajar
This research was conducted at SMA Negeri 1 Jaya from July to September 2021 with the aim of improving student learning outcomes by using the Students Teams Achievement Divisions (STAD) method on the material on Biological Diversity of class X IPA 2 students of SMA Negeri 1 Jaya. This research which consists of 2 cycles has 26 students of class X IPA 2 SMA Negeri 1 Jaya for the academic year 2021/2022 as its subject. Data analysis used a comparative descriptive analysis technique by comparing the initial conditions with the results achieved in each cycle, and qualitative descriptive analysis of the observations by comparing the results of observations in cycle I and cycle II. Through the use of the STAD method on Biological Diversity material for students of class X IPA 2 SMA Negeri 1 Jaya, the test results in the first cycle were obtained with a completeness percentage of 53.8% with an average grade of 72.7 and increased in the second cycle test results. 92.3% with an average grade of 90. In these two cycles the change in value was significant when compared to the pre-cycle with learning completeness which only reached 30.8% and the average value was 62.4. Thus the use of the STAD method can improve student learning outcomes on biodiversity material for students of class X IPA 2 SMA Negeri 1 Jaya.
Keywords: STAD type cooperative learning, participation, learning outcomes
References
Arikunto, R. I, Suharsimi. 2002. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Uzer, Usman, Moh. 2008. Menjadi Guru Profesional. Bandung:
Remaja Rosdakarya.
Trianto. 2008. Model – Model Pembelajaran Inovatif Berorientasi Konstruktifistik. Jakarta : Prestasi Pustaka.
Campbell, dkk. 2010. Biologi Jilid 3. Jakarta: Erlangga,
Nana Sudjana. 1991. Dasar-dasar Proses Belajar Mengajar, Bandung:
Sinar Baru,
Kusnandar. 2007. Guru Professional Implementasi Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan (KTSP). Jakarta: Grafindo Persada.
Slavin, robert et. al. 2008. Cooperative learning teori riset dan praktik.
Bandung: Nusa Media.
Riyanto, Yatim. 2010. Paradigma baru pembelajaran. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Suharsimi,Arikunto 1998. Prosedur Penelitian, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
http://biotigabelas.blogspot.com
http://www.slideshare.net/iszmykamaliyah/hakekat-pembelajaran.
www.infoduniapendidikan.com/2015/01/pengertian-dan-langkah-langkah-model-pembelajaran-STAD.html?m=1
Downloads
Issue
Section
License
Publication Ethics and Publication Malpractice Statement
This statement clarifies ethical behaviour of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in our journals, including the authors, the editors, the peer-reviewers and the publisher (Directorate Research and Community Service, Universitas Ubudiyah Indonesia).
Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication
The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed JES is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the authors, the journal editors, the peer reviewers, the publisher and the society.
Directorate Research and Community Service, Universitas Ubudiyah Indonesia (UUI) as publisher of this Journal takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing extremely seriously and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions.
Publication decisions
The editors of the journals are responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.
Fair play
An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.
Confidentiality
The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.
Disclosure and conflicts of interest
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.
