MENINGKATKAN HASIL BELAJAR SISWA DENGAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PROBLEM BASED LEARNING PADA MATERI BESARAN FISIKA DAN PENGUKURANNYA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33143/jes.v8i2.2415Abstract
Salah satu cara untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa terhadap mata pelajaran Fisika khususnya materi besaran fisika dan pengukurannya adalah dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran problem based learning. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa kelas X IPA-2 SMA Negeri 1 Panga Kabupaten Aceh Jaya pada mata pelajaran fisika materi besaran fisika dan pengukurannya. Manfaat dari penelitian ini adalah meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa pada mata pelajaran mata pelajaran fisika materi besaran fisika dan pengukurannya. Subjek penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas X IPA-2 SMAN 1 Panga Kabupaten Aceh Jaya Tahun Ajaran 2021/2022 yang berjumlah 24 orang siswa, untuk memperoleh data penulis menggunakan teknik tes dan non tes. Setelah data terkumpul penulis mengolah dan menganalisis data dengan cara membandingkan hasil observasi dan tes pada siklus 1 dan siklus 2. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terjadi peningkatan hasil belajar siswa yaitu dari tidak ada siswa yang lulus (0%) pada pra siklus menjadi 11 orang siswa yang lulus (46%) pada siklus I dan 20 orang siswa yang lulus (83%) pada siklus II.
Kata Kunci: hasil belajar siswa, model pembelajaran problem based learning, besaran fisika dan pengukurannya
Â
One way to improve student learning outcomes for Physics subjects, especially the material for physics quantities and their measurements, is to use a problem based learning model. The purpose of this study was to improve the learning outcomes of students in class X IPA-2 at SMA Negeri 1 Panga, Aceh Jaya Regency, in the subject of physics, the material of physics quantities and their measurements. The subjects of this study were students of class X IPA-2 SMAN 1 Panga, Aceh Jaya Regency, 2021/2022 academic year, totaling 24 students, to obtain the author's data using test and non-test techniques. After the data was collected, the writer processed and analyzed the data by comparing the results of observations and tests in cycle 1 and cycle 2. The results showed that there was an increase in student learning outcomes, namely from no students who passed (0%) in the pre-cycle to 11 students who passed (46%) in the first cycle and 20 students who passed (83%) in the second cycle.
Keywords: student learning outcomes, problem based learning learning models, physical quantities and their measurements
References
Arikunto, R. I, Suharsimi. (2002). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Ibrahim. (2000). Pembelajaran Kooperatif. Jakarta : UNESA.
Kahingan, M. (2016). .Fisika untuk SMA/MA Kelas X. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Sukino. (2016). MATEMATIKA untuk SMA/MA kelas X. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Purwadamita. (1992). Kamus Umum Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.
Sanjaya. (2006). Strategi Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Kencana Karya..
Sudjana. (2004). Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung : PT. Remaja Karya.
Surakhmad, W. (1980). Pengantar Penelitian Ilmiah. Bandung : Tarsito.
Trianto. (2007). Model Pembelajaran Terpadu Teori dan Praktek. Jakarta : Prestasi Pustaka.
Komalasari. (2013). Pembelajaran Kontekstual : Konsep dan Aplikasi. Bandung : PT. Refika Adiatama.
Muslimin Ibrahim. (2000). Pembelajaran Kooperatif. Surabaya : University Press.
Haryanto dan Warsono. (2012). Pembelajaran Aktif Teori dan Asesmen. Bandung : PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Downloads
Issue
Section
License
Publication Ethics and Publication Malpractice Statement
This statement clarifies ethical behaviour of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in our journals, including the authors, the editors, the peer-reviewers and the publisher (Directorate Research and Community Service, Universitas Ubudiyah Indonesia).
Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication
The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed JES is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the authors, the journal editors, the peer reviewers, the publisher and the society.
Directorate Research and Community Service, Universitas Ubudiyah Indonesia (UUI) as publisher of this Journal takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing extremely seriously and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions.
Publication decisions
The editors of the journals are responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.
Fair play
An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.
Confidentiality
The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.
Disclosure and conflicts of interest
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.
