MENINGKATKAN HASIL BELAJAR PADA KONSEP CACAT MATA DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN TIPE PICTURE AND PICTURE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33143/jes.v8i2.2416Abstract
Salah satu cara untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa terhadap mata pelajaran Fisika khususnya materi besaran fisika dan pengukurannya adalah dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran Tipe picture and picture. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa kelas X.MIA.1 SMA Negeri 1 Calang Kabupaten Aceh Jaya pada mata pelajaran fisika Konsep Cacat Mata. Manfaat dari penelitian ini adalah meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa pada mata pelajaran mata pelajaran fisika Konsep Cacat Mata. Subjek penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas X.MIA.1 SMA Negeri 1 Calang Kabupaten Aceh Jaya Tahun Ajaran 2020/2021 sebanyak 27 peserta didik yang terdiri dari 7 laki-laki dan 20 perempuan,, untuk memperoleh data penulis menggunakan teknik tes dan non tes. Setelah data terkumpul penulis mengolah dan menganalisis data dengan cara membandingkan hasil observasi dan tes pada siklus I, II dan siklus III. Pada siklus I secara individual 10 peserta didik tidak mencapai KKM dengan persentase tingkat ketuntasan 63%. Persentase ketuntasan secara klasikal  yaitu ketuntasan 40%. Pada Siklus II persentase tingkat ketuntasan 88% atau 24 peserta didik mencapai KKM. Sedangkan tingkat ketuntasan secara klasikal yaitu 70%. Siklus III secara individual 27 peserta didik mencapai KKM dengan tingkat ketuntasan 100%. Sedangkan secara klasikal dengan tingkat persentase ketuntasan 90%.
Kata Kunci: hasil belajar siswa, model pembelajaran problem based learning,  besaran fisika dan pengukurannya
One way to improve student learning outcomes for Physics subjects, especially the material for physics quantities and their measurements, is to use a picture and picture type learning model. The purpose of this study was to improve student learning outcomes in class X.MIA.1 SMA Negeri 1 Calang, Aceh Jaya district in the physics subject of the Concept of Eye Disability. The benefit of this research is to improve student learning outcomes in physics subjects with Eye Disability Concepts. The subjects of this study were students of class X.MIA.1 SMA Negeri 1 Calang Aceh Jaya District for the Academic Year 2020/2021 as many as 27 students consisting of 7 males and 20 females, to obtain data the authors used test and non-test techniques. After the data is collected, the writer processes and analyzes the data by comparing the results of observations and tests in cycles I, II and III. In the first cycle, 10 students individually did not reach the KKM with a completeness percentage of 63%. The percentage of completeness classically is 40% completeness. In Cycle II, the percentage of completeness was 88% or 24 students reached the KKM. While the classical completeness level is 70%. Cycle III individually 27 students reached the KKM with a 100% completeness level. While classically with a percentage level of 90% completeness.
Keywords: student learning outcomes, problem based learning learning models, physical quantities and their measurements
References
Abdurrahman, Mulijono. 2009. Pendidikan Bagi Anak Berkesulitan Belajar. Jakarta: Reneka Cipta.
Afandi. M, dkk. 2013. Model Dan Metode Pembelajaran di Sekolah. Semarang: Sultan Agung Press.
Arifin, Z. 2009. Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2006. Prosedur Penelitian. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
-----------------------. 2010. Prosedur Penelitian. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta. Budiningsih, Asri. 2005. Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.
Dharma, Surya. 2008. Kriteria dan Indikator Keberhasilan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.
Hamalik, Oemar. 2005. Psikologi Belajar & Mengajar. Bandung: Sinar Baru Algensindo.
Isjoni. 2010. Cooperative Learning. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Istarani. 2012. 58 Model Pembelajaran Inovatif. Medan: Media Persada.
Johar, Rahmah dkk. 2006. Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Banda Aceh: Universitas Syiah Kuala.
Muslisch, M. 2009. Melakukan PTK Itu Mudah. Jakarata: Bumi Aksara.
Munandar, M 2006. Pokok-pokok Intermadiate Accounting. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.
Nurhadi, dkk. 2003. Pembelajaran Kontekstual dan Penerapannya dalam KBK. Malang: Universitas Negeri Malang.
Rusman. 2011. Model-Model Pembelajaran: Mengembangkan Profesionalisme Guru. Jakarta: Rajawali Perss.
Sanjaya, W. 2010. Strategi Pembelajaran Berorientasi Standar Pendidikan. Jakarta: Kencana.
Downloads
Issue
Section
License
Publication Ethics and Publication Malpractice Statement
This statement clarifies ethical behaviour of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in our journals, including the authors, the editors, the peer-reviewers and the publisher (Directorate Research and Community Service, Universitas Ubudiyah Indonesia).
Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication
The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed JES is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the authors, the journal editors, the peer reviewers, the publisher and the society.
Directorate Research and Community Service, Universitas Ubudiyah Indonesia (UUI) as publisher of this Journal takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing extremely seriously and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions.
Publication decisions
The editors of the journals are responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.
Fair play
An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.
Confidentiality
The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.
Disclosure and conflicts of interest
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.
