ANALISIS KEGIATAN SENAM RUTIN KELOMPOK B DI PAUD IT MINA ACEH BESAR
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33143/jes.v8i2.2424Abstract
Kegiatan senam yang dilakukan secara rutin akan membantu proses perkembangan motorik kasar anak usia 5-6 tahun. Rumusan masalah penelitian ini yaitu bagaimanakah proses pelaksanaan senam rutin dan faktor apa sajakah yang mendukung dan menghambat pelaksanaan senam rutin pada kelompok B PAUD IT Mina. Tujuan penelitian untuk menganalisis proses pelaksanaan senam rutin pada kelompok B dan untuk menganalisis faktor yang mendukung dan menghambat pelaksanaan senam rutin pada kelompok B PAUD IT Mina. Penelitian ini menggunakan desain kualitatif, yang menjadi subjek penelitian guru kelompok B berjumlah 2 orang. Instrumen pengumpulan data menggunakan lembar wawancara, observasi dan dokumentasi. Analisis data menggunakan model analisis kualitatif Miles dan Huberman yaitu pengumpulan data, reduksi data, penyajian data dan kesimpulan beserta verifikasi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa proses pelaksanaan senam rutin pada kelompok B dilaksanakan setiap pagi selama 30 menit mulai pukul 07.50 sampai 08.20. Senam rutin menggunakan model demontrasi, yaitu guru memberikan contoh gerakan senam kepada anak yang terdiri dari tiga latihan yaitu latihan pemanasan, latihan inti, dan latihan pendinginan. Faktor yang mendukung terlaksananya senam rutin di PAUD IT Mina tersedianya sarana dan prasarana sekolah, guru-guru yang kreatif menciptakan gerakan-gerakan senam. Sedangkan faktor yang menghambat keterlaksanaan senam rutin diantaranya masih menggunakan tafe recorder, dukungan orangtua masih rendah, dan tidak adanya instruktur senam yang profesional dimiliki PAUD IT Mina.
Kata Kunci: analisis, senam rutin.
Â
Gymnastics activities carried out regularly will help the process of gross motor development of children aged 5-6 years. The formulation of the research problem is how the process of implementing routine exercise and what factors support and hinder the implementation of routine exercise in group B PAUD IT Mina. The purpose of the study was to analyze the process of implementing routine exercise in group B and to analyze the factors that support and hinder the implementation of routine exercise in group B PAUD IT Mina. This study used a qualitative design, which became the research subject of group B teachers totaling 2 people. The data collection instrument used interview sheets, observation and documentation. Data analysis uses Miles and Huberman's qualitative analysis model, namely data collection, data reduction, data presentation and conclusions along with verification. The results showed that the process of implementing routine exercise in group B was carried out every morning for 30 minutes from 07.50 to 08.20. Routine gymnastics uses a demonstration model, where the teacher gives examples of gymnastic movements to children which consists of three exercises, namely warm-up exercises, core exercises, and cool-down exercises Factors that support the implementation of routine gymnastics at PAUD IT Mina are the availability of school facilities and infrastructure, creative teachers create gymnastic movements. While the factors that hinder the implementation of routine gymnastics include still using a tafe recorder, low parental support, and the absence of a professional gymnastics instructor owned by PAUD IT Mina.
Keywords: analysis, routine exercise.
Â
Â
References
Aip Syarifuddin dan Muhadi,2010. Pendidikan Jasmani dan Kesehatan. Jakarta : Depdikbud.
Arikunto & Safruddin,2011. Evaluasi Program Pendidikan. Jakarta : Bumi Aksara. Burhan Bungin, 2013. Penelitian Kualitatif Komunikasi, Ekonomi, Kebijakan. Publik,
dan Ilmu Sosial lainnya. Jakarta: Prenada Media ..
Hartaji, 2012. Motivasi Berprestasi Pada Mahasiswa yang Berkuliah. Dengan
Jurusan Pilihan Orangtua. Fakultas Psikologi Universitas. Gunadarma. Hadi, 2005. Metodologi Research. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.
Imam Hidayat,1995. Senam. Diklat. Bandung: FPOK IKIP.
Margono,2009. Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan. PT Rineka Cipta. Jakarta
Moleong, 2005. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif Edisi Revisi. Bandung: PT. RemajaRosdakarya
Mahendra, 2001. Senam Artistik: Teori dan Metode Pembelajaran Senam untuk
Mahasiswa FPOK. Bandung: FPOK – UPI Bandung.
Poerwadarminta, 2005. Kamus Umum Bahasa Indonesia. Edisi Ketiga. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka
Samsu,2007. Psikologi Perkembangan Anak dan Remaja. Remaja Rosdakarya : Bandung
Sapto Madijo,2010. Bergembira dengan Senam. Semarang: Aneka Ilmu
Surahmad, 1992. Pengantar Penelitian Ilmiah Dasar Metode dan Teknik. Bandung:Tarsito.
Sora, 2014. Pengertian Populasi Dan Sampel Serta Teknik Sampling. Diterima dari http://www.pengertianku.net/2015/03/pengertian-populasi-dan-sampelserta- teknik-sampling.html. Diakses pada tanggal 5 November
Siswoyo,2007. Ilmu Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: UNY Press
Sujiono,2008. Metode Pengembangan Fisik . Jakarta: Universitas. Terbuka
Sukmadinata,2012. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung. PT. Remaja.
Arikunto. 2010. Prosedur penelitiansuati pendekatan praktik. Jakarta :rineka cipta. Sugiyono, 2014. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung :Alfabeta.
Suyatno, 2015. Konsep Dasar Anak Usia Dini : Jakarta : Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.
Sutrisno dan Khafadi,2010. Pendidikan Jasmani,. Olahraga, dan Kesehatan 2.
Surakarta: CV. Putra Nugraha.
Yusuf, 2012. Pembelajaran Bahasa Berbasis Pendidikan Karakter. Bandung: PT.Refika Aditama
Downloads
Issue
Section
License
Publication Ethics and Publication Malpractice Statement
This statement clarifies ethical behaviour of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in our journals, including the authors, the editors, the peer-reviewers and the publisher (Directorate Research and Community Service, Universitas Ubudiyah Indonesia).
Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication
The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed JES is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the authors, the journal editors, the peer reviewers, the publisher and the society.
Directorate Research and Community Service, Universitas Ubudiyah Indonesia (UUI) as publisher of this Journal takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing extremely seriously and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions.
Publication decisions
The editors of the journals are responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.
Fair play
An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.
Confidentiality
The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.
Disclosure and conflicts of interest
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.
