Evaluasi Pasca Diklat Barang Milik Negara (BMN) pada Balai Diklat Keagamaan Aceh Tahun 2018

Authors

  • Razali Yunus Widyaiswara BDK Aceh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33143/jes.v5i1.356

Abstract

Evaluasi pasca pelaksanaan diklat bagi Aparatur Sipil Negara (ASN) dibutuhkan untuk mengetahui dan menilai sejauh mana manfaat suatu program diklat yang sudah diselenggarakan. Manfaat pelaksanaan diklat ini dinilai pada 3 (tiga) aspek kompetensi dari lulusan diklat yang diharapkan, yaitu: (1) aspek penambahan pengetahuan dan wawasan; (2) aspek peningkatan keterampilan; dan (3) aspek perbaikan sikap perilaku. Penilaian dilakukan kepada alumni diklat teknis pengelolaan Barang Milik Negara (BMN) yang sudah melaksanakan tugas dan pekerjaan mereka di kantornya masing-masing selesai diklat. Penelitian ini dilakukan pada seluruh alumni BMN tahun 2018 yang berjumlah 30 orang. Dengan menggunakan kuisioner sebagai instrument penelitian dan melakukan FGD untuk mengetahui kualitas Pelaksanaan diklat.  Hasil Penelitian menunjukkan bahwa adanya peningkatan kompetensi aparatur meliputi peningkatan pengetahuan dan wawasan, keterampilan dan perbaikan sikap perilaku kerja serta peningkatan kualitas pengelolaan BMN. Pelaksanaan program diklat memperlihatkan efektifitas yang cukup tinggi, dimana adanya manfaat bagi individu peserta/alumni diklat, bagi unit kerja maupun bagi organisasi tempatnya bekerja.

Kata Kunci:   Program Diklat, Evaluasi Pasca Diklat, BMN

References

Bramley.P.(1991.Evaluating Training Effectivenes : Translating Theori to Practice. Berkshire. Enfland: Mc Graw-Hill Book Company.

Donald L. Kirkpatrick.(1996), Evaluating Training Program. The Four level : San Francisco. Berret-Kohler Publishers.

Pemerintah Daerah Provinsi Sumatera Barat. (2001). Perda Nomor 6 tahun 2001 Tentang Struktur Organisasi dan Tata Kerja Badan Dinas Kantor Provinsi Sumatera Barat.

Prasetia Irawan. (1999). Logika dan Prosedur Penelitian, Jakarta : Sekolah Tinggi llmu Administrasi Negara-Lembaga Administrasi Negara.

Republik Indonesia.(2001). Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 101/2000, tentang Pendidikan dan Pelatihan PNS dalam Jabatan. Pemerintah Republik Indonesia.

Suharsimi Arikunto.(1996). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan.Jakarta : Bumi Aksara.

Sujanto. (2002). Pendekatan Belajar Andragogi: Bahan Ajar Management of Training. Jakarta LAN-RI.

Downloads

Published

2019-05-17

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 1 (2019): April 2019

Section

Articles

License

Publication Ethics and Publication Malpractice Statement

This statement clarifies ethical behaviour of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in our journals, including the authors, the editors, the peer-reviewers and the publisher (Directorate Research and Community Service, Universitas Ubudiyah Indonesia).


Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication

The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed JES is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the authors, the journal editors, the peer reviewers, the publisher and the society.

Directorate Research and Community Service, Universitas Ubudiyah Indonesia (UUI) as publisher of this Journal takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing extremely seriously and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions.


Publication decisions

The editors of the  journals are responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Fair play

An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.


Confidentiality

The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.


Disclosure and conflicts of interest

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.