PENERAPAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN TIPE NHT (NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER) UNTUK MENINGKATKAN HASIL BELAJAR SISWA MATERI FOTOSINTESIS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33143/jes.v8i2.2419Abstrak
Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan tujuan: (1) Untuk mengetahui hasil belajar siswa dalam mempelajari fotosintesis melalui pembelajaran kooperatif tipe NHT, (2) untuk mengetahui aktivitas guru dan siswa selama proses belajar mengajar dengan penggunaan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe NHT dan (3) untuk melihat respon belajar siswa setelah penerapan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe NHT. Penelitian ini dilaksanakan di SMAN 1 Jaya dari bulan Agustus sampai bulan September 2022. Subjek dalam penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas XII MIPA 2 sebanyak 26 siswa. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian tindakan kelas (PTK) dengan menggunakan dua siklus. Hasil penelitian yang diperoleh dari lembar observasi, angket, dan tes dianalisis dengan menggunakan rumus persentase. Hasil penelitian aktivitas guru pada siklus I 78,15% dan pada siklus II 93,76%, aktivitas siswa pada siklus I 70,11% dan pada siklus II 85,16% dan hasil test menunjukkan peningkatan dari siklus I 66,92% menjadi 85% pada siklus II. Sedangkan respon siswa terhadap penerapan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe NHT sangat baik yaitu mencapai 91,76%. Berdasarkan penelitian dapat disimpulkan bahwa penerapan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe NHT dapat meningkatkan hasil belajar biologi pada materi fotosintesis siswa kelas XII MIPA 2 di SMAN 1 Jaya.
Kata Kunci: Numbered Heads Together, Hasil Belajar, Fotosintesis
This research was conducted with the following objectives: (1) To determine student learning outcomes in studying photosynthesis through cooperative learning of the NHT type, (2) to determine the activities of teachers and students during the teaching and learning process using the NHT type of cooperative learning model and (3) to see the response student learning after the application of the NHT type cooperative learning model. This research was conducted at SMAN 1 Jaya from August to September 2022. The subjects in this study were 26 students of class XII MIPA 2. This research is a classroom action research (CAR) using two cycles. The research results obtained from observation sheets, questionnaires, and tests were analyzed using the percentage formula. The results of the research on teacher activity in the first cycle were 78.15% and in the second cycle 93.76%, student activity in the first cycle was 70.11% and in the second cycle 85.16% and the test results showed an increase from 66.92% in the first cycle to 85% in cycle II. Meanwhile, the students' response to the application of the NHT type of cooperative learning model was very good, reaching 91.76%. Based on the research, it can be concluded that the application of the cooperative learning model of the NHT type can improve the learning outcomes of biology in the photosynthetic material of class XII MIPA 2 students at SMAN 1 Jaya.
Keywords: Numbered Heads Together, Learning Outcomes, Photosynthesis
Referensi
Arikunto, Suharsimi. (2002). Prosedur Penelitian suatu Pendidikan Praktek, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Aqib, Zainal. (2006). Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Bandung: Yrama Widya.
Djajadisastra. (1982). Metode-Metode Mengajar. Bandung: CV. Angkasa.
H. Anwar, Budiman. (2005). 1700 Soal Bimbingan Pemantapan Biologi untuk SMA, Bandung: Yrama Widya.
Kasirin, Tierta. (2007). Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe NHT. Http://rizaltirtakasirin.blogspot.com/.../model-pembelajaran-kooperatif-tipe-nht.html. 9 Juni 2010: 11.10 AM.
Lettu Heru, J. D. (1998). Media Pembelajaran Dalam Proses Belajar Mengajar Masa Kini, Jakarta: Depdikbud Dirjen Pendidikan Tinggi.
Unduhan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Publication Ethics and Publication Malpractice Statement
This statement clarifies ethical behaviour of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in our journals, including the authors, the editors, the peer-reviewers and the publisher (Directorate Research and Community Service, Universitas Ubudiyah Indonesia).
Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication
The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed JES is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the authors, the journal editors, the peer reviewers, the publisher and the society.
Directorate Research and Community Service, Universitas Ubudiyah Indonesia (UUI) as publisher of this Journal takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing extremely seriously and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions.
Publication decisions
The editors of the journals are responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.
Fair play
An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.
Confidentiality
The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.
Disclosure and conflicts of interest
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.
