KAJIAN LITERATUR FILOSOFI PENDIDIKAN VOKASIONAL MENURUT TEORI PROSSER (1925) BERBASIS DUNIA KERJA

Penulis

  • Satria Yudhistira Universitas Negeri Padang
  • Rijal Abdullah
  • Hendra Hidayat

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33143/jes.v11i2.5616

Abstrak

Pendidikan vokasional memiliki peran strategis dalam menyiapkan sumber daya manusia yang kompeten dan relevan dengan kebutuhan dunia kerja. Di Indonesia, pengembangan pendidikan vokasional masih banyak merujuk pada teori Charles Prosser (1925) yang dikenal dengan enam belas prinsip pendidikan vokasional. Namun, dinamika dunia kerja modern menuntut adanya peninjauan kembali terhadap relevansi filosofi tersebut. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji secara kritis filosofi pendidikan vokasional menurut teori Prosser serta relevansinya dalam konteks pendidikan vokasional berbasis dunia kerja di Indonesia. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif deskriptif melalui studi literatur dengan analisis tematik terhadap buku, artikel jurnal nasional dan internasional, serta dokumen kebijakan pendidikan. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa tidak seluruh prinsip Prosser dapat diterapkan secara utuh dalam sistem pendidikan vokasional Indonesia. Beberapa prinsip masih relevan, terutama yang menekankan kesesuaian kurikulum dengan kebutuhan industri dan pembelajaran berbasis pengalaman kerja, sementara prinsip lainnya memerlukan penyesuaian dengan tuntutan fleksibilitas, pembelajaran sepanjang hayat, dan perkembangan teknologi. Temuan ini menegaskan perlunya integrasi filosofi Prosser dengan pendekatan pragmatis modern agar pendidikan vokasional mampu menghasilkan lulusan yang adaptif dan berdaya saing. Kata kunci: pendidikan vokasional, filosofi pendidikan, teori Prosser, dunia kerja

Referensi

Adlini, M. N., Dinda, A. H., Yulinda, S., Chotimah, O., & Merliyana, S. J. (2022). Metode penelitian kualitatif studi pustaka. Edumaspul: Jurnal Pendidikan, 6(1), 974–980. https://doi.org/10.33487/edumaspul.v6i1.3394

Ajjawi, R., Tai, J., Nghia, T. L. H., Boud, D., Johnson, L., & Patrick, C. J. (2020). Aligning assessment with the needs of work-integrated learning: The challenges of authentic assessment in a complex context. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(2), 304–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1639613

Ali, M. (2012). Pengantar filsafat: Dari masa klasik hingga postmodernisme (Cetakan ke-6). Ar-Ruzz Media.

Buheji, M. (2020). Forward from editor in chief: Realising creating legacies & meaning of existence as inspiration and resilience economy concepts. International Journal of Inspiration & Resilience Economy, 4(1), 1–5.

Enjang Suhaedin, Jalinus, N., & Abdullah, R. (2023). Landasan filosofi dan prinsip pendidikan teknologi dan kejuruan menggunakan metode systematic literature review. Journal on Education, 6(1), 10317–10326.

Fajar, C., & Hartanto, B. (2019). Tantangan pendidikan vokasi di era revolusi industri 4.0 dalam menyiapkan sumber daya manusia yang unggul. Dalam Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pascasarjana (hlm. 163–171).

Irwanto. (2022). Tinjauan deskriptif teori Prosser dalam rangka meningkatkan kualitas kurikulum di sekolah menengah kejuruan. Natural Science Education Research, 447–462.

Prosser, C. A., & Quigley, T. H. (1950). Vocational education in a democracy. American Technical Society.

Rojewski, J. W. (2002). Preparing the workforce of tomorrow: A conceptual framework for career and technical education. Journal of Vocational Education Research, 27(1), 7–35.

Sudira, P. (2018). Filosofi dan teori pendidikan vokasi dan kejuruan. UNY Press.

Suharno, Pambudi, N. A., & Harjanto, B. (2020). Vocational education in Indonesia: History, development, opportunities, and challenges. Children and Youth Services Review, 115, 105092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105092

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional.

Verawardina, U., & Jama, J. (2018). Philosophy TVET di era disrupsi revolusi industri 4.0 di Indonesia. Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia, 1(3), 104–111. https://doi.org/10.23887/jfi.v1i3.17156

Unduhan

Diterbitkan

2025-10-28

Terbitan

Vol 11 No 2 (2025): OKTOBER 2025

Bagian

Articles

Lisensi

Publication Ethics and Publication Malpractice Statement

This statement clarifies ethical behaviour of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in our journals, including the authors, the editors, the peer-reviewers and the publisher (Directorate Research and Community Service, Universitas Ubudiyah Indonesia).


Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication

The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed JES is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the authors, the journal editors, the peer reviewers, the publisher and the society.

Directorate Research and Community Service, Universitas Ubudiyah Indonesia (UUI) as publisher of this Journal takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing extremely seriously and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions.


Publication decisions

The editors of the  journals are responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Fair play

An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.


Confidentiality

The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.


Disclosure and conflicts of interest

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.