ANALISIS KEMAMPUAN MAHASISWA PRODI PENDIDIKAN GURU MADRASAH IBTIDAIYAH (PGMI) FAKULTAS TARBIYAH DAN KEGURUAN (FTK) UIN AR-RANIRY DALAM MATA KULIAH STATISTIK PENDIDIKAN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33143/jes.v6i2.1118Abstrak
Abstrak
Â
           Statistik Pendidikan merupakan salah satu mata kuliah wajib bagi mahasiswa. Mata kuliah ini termasuk salah satu mata kuliah yang kurang diminati oleh mahasiswa karena berhubungan dengan rumus-rumus dan angka seperti juga halnya pelajaran matematika. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian deskriptif yang bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan atau menggambarkan kemampuan mahasiswa pada mata kuliah statistik pendidikan. Penelitian  ini di lakukan di Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Keguruan (FTK) UIN Ar-Raniry semester genap tahun 2019-2020. Subjek dalam penelitian ini adalah seluruh  mahasiswa  prodi PGMI yang  mengambil mata kuliah Statistik Pendidikan. Sedangkan  yang dijadikan  sampel sebanyak 60 orang yang terdiri dari dua unit/kelas yang dipilih secara acak. Pengumpulan  data dilakukan  melalui  tes  dan wawancara. sedangkan analisis datanya menggunakan statistik deskriptif. Berdasarkan analisis data dapat disimpulkan bahwa persentase kemampuan mahasiswa prodi PGMI dalam mata kuliah statistik pendidikan yang memiliki  kategori  baik sebanyak 16 mahasiswa (26.7%), kategori cukup 22 mahasiswa (36.7%)  dan kategori kurang sebanyak 22 mahasiswa (36.7%). Kesulitan yang sering dialami mahasiswa umumnya terletak pada kurang teliti dalam berhitung ketika menjawab soal serta kebingungan dalam menentukan rumus yang akan digunakan.
Kata kunci : Kemampuan Belajar, Statistik Pendidikan
Â
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Publication Ethics and Publication Malpractice Statement
This statement clarifies ethical behaviour of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in our journals, including the authors, the editors, the peer-reviewers and the publisher (Directorate Research and Community Service, Universitas Ubudiyah Indonesia).
Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication
The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed JES is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the authors, the journal editors, the peer reviewers, the publisher and the society.
Directorate Research and Community Service, Universitas Ubudiyah Indonesia (UUI) as publisher of this Journal takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing extremely seriously and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions.
Publication decisions
The editors of the journals are responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.
Fair play
An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.
Confidentiality
The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.
Disclosure and conflicts of interest
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.
