PERBANDINGAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE COURSE REVIEW HORRAY DENGAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN MAKE A MATCH TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR IPAS DI SD NEGERI 5 BANDA ACEH
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33143/jes.v10i1.3884Abstrak
Model pembelajaran merupakan kerangka konseptual yang melukiskan prosedur yang sistematis dalam mengorganisasikan pengalaman belajar untuk mencapai tujuan pembelajaran. Penerapan model pembelajaran course review horray dan model pembelajaran make a match telah banyak dilakukan. Namun tingakt perbandingan pada model keduanya belum pernah dilakukan pada khususnya pada mata pelajaran IPAS di SD. Penelitian ini dilaksanan di SD Negeri 5 Banda Acehyang bertujuan untuk mengkaji efektivitas penggunaan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Course Review Horray dengan model pembelajaran make a match pada mata pelajaran IPAS. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas IV SD Negeri 5 Banda Aceh. Pengambilan sampel dilakukan dengan teknik purposive sampling, total responden 28 siswa dan kelas IV B sebanyak 28 siswa. Teknik pengumpulan data berupa dilakukan dengan pemberian tes. Data diolah menggunakan SPSS 25 dengan taraf signifikan 5% dengan uji N-Gain score diperoleh nilai mean untuk kelas CRH sebesar 0,5740 sedangkan untuk model MAM diperoleh mean sebesar 0,4242. Hasil uji-t menggunakan independen samples test CRH dan MAM menunjukkan hasil belajar yang diajarkan kedua model tersebut setara. Namun hasil belajar model pembelajaran course review horray lebih meningkat dibandingkan pembelajaran dengan model make a match dilihat dari hasil belajar kelas CRH 1.900 > 1.690 hasil belajar kelas MAM. Dengan demikian kesimpulan akhir yang didapatkan adalah model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe course review horray lebih baik dibandingkan dengan model pembelajaran make a match pada mata pelajaran IPAS di SD Negeri 5 Banda Aceh.
Kata Kunci: Pembelajaran Kooperatif, Make a Match, Course Review Horray
The learning model is a conceptual framework that describes a systematic procedure for organizing learning experiences into learning goals. The application of the course review horray learning model and the make a match learning model has been done a lot. This study was conducted at SD Negri 5 Banda Aceh and aimed at studying the effectiveness of the use of a cooperative learning model type Course Review Horray with the learning model making a match on IPAS subjects. The population in this study is a student of the IV grade in SD Negeri 5, Banda Aceh. Sampling was done using purposive sampling techniques with a total of 28 respondents and 28 students in class IV B. Data collection techniques are tested. The data was processed using SPSS 25 with a 5% significant level, with the N-Gain test score obtaining a mean value for the CRH class of 0.5740 and for the MAM model obtaining a mean of 0.4242. The results of the test using independent samples of the CRH and MAM tests showed that the learning results taught by both models were equal. However, the learning outcome of the course review horray model has increased in comparison with the learning outcome of the make-a-match model, as seen from the CRH 1.900 > 1.690 learning outcomes of the MAM class. Thus, the final conclusion obtained is that the cooperative learning model of course review Horray type is better compared to the learning model made a match on the IPAS subjects in SD Negeri 5 Banda Aceh.
Keyword: Cooperative learning, Make a Match, Course Review Horray
Referensi
Aziizu, B. Y. A. (2015). Tujuan Besar Pendidikan Adalah Tindakan. Prosiding Penelitian Dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 2(2), 295–300. https://doi.org/10.24198/jppm.v2i2.13540.
Adib, H . S. (2017). Teknik pengembangan instrumen penelitian ilmiah di perguruan tinggi keagamaan islam. In Prosising Seminar Nasional & Internasional
Daniel, B. K., & Harland, T. (2017). Higher Education Research Methodology. Higher Education Research Methodology. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315149783.
Eliyah, S., Isnani, I., & Utami, W. B. (2018). Keefektifan Model Pembelajaran Course Review Horay Berbantuan Power Point Terhadap Kepercayaan Diri Dan Prestasi Belajar. JES-MAT (Jurnal Edukasi Dan Sains Matematika), 4(2), 131. https://doi.org/10.25134/jes-mat.v4i2.1455
Fauhah, H., & Rosy, B. (2021). Analisis Model Pembelajaran Make A Match Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Administrasi Perkantoran (JPAP), 9(2), 321–334. https://doi.org/10.26740/jpap.v9n2.p321 34.
Faradita, M. (2017). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Course Review Horay Terhadap Motivasi Belajar Siswa Mata Pelajaran IPA di Sekolah Dasar. LSE (Elementary School Education Journal): Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Sekolah Dasar, 1(2b), 185–192.
Jaelani, A. (2015). Pembelajaran Kooperatif, Sebagai Salah Satu Model Pembelajaran Di Madrasah Ibtidaiyya (Mi). Al Ibtida: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru MI, 2(1), 1–16.
Khoerunnisa, P., & Aqwal, S. M. (2020). Analisis Model-model Pembelajaran. Fondatia, 4(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.36088/fondatia.v4i1.441
Sugiyono.2012.Metode penelitian pendidikan. Bandung : Alfabeta.
Suryawati,I. (2022). Peningkatan Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Melalui Media Origami Pada Siswa Sekolah Dasar Dikota Banda Aceh. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika (JPM), 2022.8.2:90-99.
Wijanarko, Y. (2017). Model Pembelajaran Make a Match Untuk Pembelajaran Ipa Yang Menyenangkan. Taman Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Ke-SD-An, 1(1), 52–59. https://doi.org/10.30738/tc.v1i1.1579.
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Publication Ethics and Publication Malpractice Statement
This statement clarifies ethical behaviour of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in our journals, including the authors, the editors, the peer-reviewers and the publisher (Directorate Research and Community Service, Universitas Ubudiyah Indonesia).
Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication
The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed JES is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the authors, the journal editors, the peer reviewers, the publisher and the society.
Directorate Research and Community Service, Universitas Ubudiyah Indonesia (UUI) as publisher of this Journal takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing extremely seriously and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions.
Publication decisions
The editors of the journals are responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.
Fair play
An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.
Confidentiality
The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.
Disclosure and conflicts of interest
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.
