ANALISIS KESULITAN PEMBELAJARAN IPS DALAM KELAS INKLUSI DI SEKOLAH DASAR NEGERI BANDA ACEH
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33143/jes.v11i2.5708Abstrak
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kesulitan pembelajaran Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial (IPS) dalam kelas inklusi di Sekolah Dasar Negeri Banda Aceh. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan metode deskriptif. Subjek penelitian meliputi guru kelas, guru pendamping khusus, serta siswa berkebutuhan khusus yang mengikuti pembelajaran IPS. Teknik pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui observasi, wawancara, dan dokumentasi, kemudian dianalisis menggunakan teknik reduksi data, penyajian data, dan penarikan kesimpulan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kesulitan pembelajaran IPS dalam kelas inklusi meliputi perbedaan kemampuan kognitif siswa, keterbatasan guru dalam menerapkan strategi pembelajaran yang adaptif, kurangnya media pembelajaran yang sesuai, serta keterbatasan waktu dalam memberikan pendampingan individual. Selain itu, pemahaman konsep abstrak dalam materi IPS menjadi tantangan utama bagi siswa berkebutuhan khusus. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa diperlukan modifikasi metode pembelajaran, penggunaan media yang variatif, serta kolaborasi antara guru kelas dan guru pendamping khusus untuk meningkatkan efektivitas pembelajaran IPS di kelas inklusi. Kata Kunci: kesulitan belajar, IPS, kelas inklusi, sekolah dasarReferensi
Ainscow, M. (2020). Promoting inclusion and equity in education: Lessons from international experiences. London: Routledge.
Amka, A., & Mirnawati, M. (2021). Implementasi pendidikan inklusif di sekolah dasar: Tantangan dan solusi pembelajaran. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 12(1), 45–53.
Arends, R. I. (2018). Learning to teach (10th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Fitria, D., & Suyanto, S. (2020). Kesulitan belajar siswa berkebutuhan khusus dalam pembelajaran tematik di sekolah inklusi. Jurnal Pendidikan Inklusi, 4(2), 101–110.
Friend, M., & Bursuck, W. D. (2019). Including students with special needs: A practical guide for classroom teachers (8th ed.). Boston: Pearson.
Handayani, T. (2019). Peran guru pendamping khusus dalam mendukung pembelajaran di kelas inklusi. Jurnal Pendidikan Khusus, 16(1), 33–41.
Hidayat, R. (2019). Strategi pembelajaran pada kelas inklusi di sekolah dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Khusus, 15(2), 68–76.
Kemendikbud. (2020). Pedoman penyelenggaraan pendidikan inklusif di sekolah dasar. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Lestari, N., & Wahyuni, S. (2022). Penggunaan media visual dalam meningkatkan pemahaman konsep IPS pada siswa sekolah dasar. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 9(2), 120–128.
Pratama, R., & Huda, M. (2021). Strategi diferensiasi pembelajaran dalam kelas inklusi di sekolah dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 6(3), 215–223.
Santrock, J. W. (2020). Educational psychology (6th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Slavin, R. E. (2018). Educational psychology: Theory and practice (12th ed.). Boston: Pearson.
Susanto, A. (2021). Teori belajar dan pembelajaran di sekolah dasar. Jakarta: Kencana.
Tomlinson, C. A. (2017). How to differentiate instruction in academically diverse classrooms (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Trianto. (2019). Model pembelajaran terpadu: Konsep, strategi, dan implementasinya dalam kurikulum. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Publication Ethics and Publication Malpractice Statement
This statement clarifies ethical behaviour of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in our journals, including the authors, the editors, the peer-reviewers and the publisher (Directorate Research and Community Service, Universitas Ubudiyah Indonesia).
Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication
The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed JES is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the authors, the journal editors, the peer reviewers, the publisher and the society.
Directorate Research and Community Service, Universitas Ubudiyah Indonesia (UUI) as publisher of this Journal takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing extremely seriously and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions.
Publication decisions
The editors of the journals are responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.
Fair play
An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.
Confidentiality
The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.
Disclosure and conflicts of interest
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.
