ANALISIS KETERAMPILAN COMPUTATIONAL THINKING SISWA SEKOLAH DASAR KELAS IV DI BANDA ACEH
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33143/jes.v11i2.5605Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kemampuan computational thinking siswa kelas IV Sekolah Dasar Negeri (SDN) di Banda Aceh. Computational thinking merupakan keterampilan berpikir yang penting dalam pembelajaran abad ke-21, khususnya dalam mendukung pemecahan masalah secara sistematis dan logis. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan deskriptif kualitatif dengan subjek penelitian siswa kelas IV di salah satu SDN di Banda Aceh. Teknik pengumpulan data meliputi observasi pembelajaran, tes berbasis masalah kontekstual, serta wawancara dengan guru kelas. Instrumen penelitian disusun berdasarkan empat indikator computational thinking, yaitu dekomposisi, pengenalan pola, abstraksi, dan perancangan algoritma. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kemampuan dekomposisi dan pengenalan pola siswa berada pada kategori sedang, sedangkan kemampuan abstraksi dan perancangan algoritma masih berada pada kategori rendah. Temuan ini mengindikasikan bahwa siswa masih memerlukan dukungan pembelajaran yang terstruktur dan kontekstual untuk mengembangkan computational thinking secara optimal. Penelitian ini diharapkan dapat menjadi dasar dalam pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran berbasis coding dan literasi digital di sekolah dasar.References
Apriana, D., Suarni, N. K., Margunayasa, I. G., & Hudri, M. (2023). Meta analisis implementasi computational thinking untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar IPAS di sekolah dasar. Journal of Elementary School, 6(2), 1–15.
Cahyani, A. A. D., Sumartiningsih, S., & Purwati, P. D. (2025). Pengaruh pendekatan computational thinking berbasis problem based learning terhadap kemampuan membaca teks informasi siswa sekolah dasar. Pendas: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 10(1), 1–10.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2020). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Fajriati, R., Mutiawati, M., & Ashlan, S. (2024). Analisis kemampuan literasi bahasa siswa kelas V SDN Banda Aceh. Journal of Education Science, 10(1), 1–9.
Kamil, N. (2023). Implementasi pendekatan computational thinking berbasis desain algoritma terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah pada anak. IEEJ: Islamic Elementary Education Journal, 4(2), 45–53.
Megawati, A. T., Sholihah, M., & Limiansih, K. (2023). Implementasi computational thinking dalam pembelajaran matematika di sekolah dasar. Jurnal Review Pendidikan Dasar, 9(2), 95–104.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2020). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Sugiyono. (2021). Metode penelitian pendidikan: Pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Yanti, Y. R., & Sari, E. F. (2024). Profil kemampuan computational thinking siswa kelas V sekolah dasar. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 8(1), 1–8.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Publication Ethics and Publication Malpractice Statement
This statement clarifies ethical behaviour of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in our journals, including the authors, the editors, the peer-reviewers and the publisher (Directorate Research and Community Service, Universitas Ubudiyah Indonesia).
Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication
The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed JES is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the authors, the journal editors, the peer reviewers, the publisher and the society.
Directorate Research and Community Service, Universitas Ubudiyah Indonesia (UUI) as publisher of this Journal takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing extremely seriously and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions.
Publication decisions
The editors of the journals are responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.
Fair play
An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.
Confidentiality
The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.
Disclosure and conflicts of interest
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.
