MANAJEMEN KONFLIK DI SEKOLAH DASAR: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW TERHADAP PEMETAAN MASALAH DAN KERANGKA TEORITIK SCHOOL-BASED MEDIATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33143/jes.v12i1.5850Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memetakan permasalahan konflik sosial di sekolah dasar serta mengkaji kerangka teoritik school-based mediation (SBM) melalui pendekatan systematic literature review (SLR). Penelitian menggunakan metode PRISMA dengan sumber data dari Scopus, Web of Science, dan Google Scholar pada rentang tahun 2015–2025. Sebanyak 30 artikel yang memenuhi kriteria inklusi dianalisis secara tematik. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa konflik di sekolah dasar didominasi oleh konflik interpersonal, bullying, dan kesalahpahaman komunikasi yang berdampak pada kesehatan mental siswa. Pendekatan manajemen konflik yang berkembang meliputi pendekatan disipliner, restoratif, dan mediasi. School-based mediation terbukti efektif dalam meningkatkan keterampilan sosial-emosional, empati, dan resolusi konflik secara damai. Namun, sebagian besar penelitian masih berfokus pada konteks Barat dan belum terintegrasi dengan nilai sosial budaya lokal. Penelitian ini memberikan kontribusi berupa pemetaan isu konflik sekolah dasar dan sintesis kerangka teoritik SBM sebagai dasar pengembangan model manajemen konflik berbasis konteks. Kata kunci: Manajemen Konflik, Sekolah Dasar, School-Based Mediation, Kesehatan Mental, Systematic Literature Review. CONFLICT MANAGEMENT IN PRIMARY SCHOOLS: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW ON PROBLEM MAPPING AND THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK OF SCHOOL-BASED MEDIATION Abstract This study aims to map social conflict issues in primary schools and examine the theoretical framework of school-based mediation (SBM) through a systematic literature review (SLR). The study employs the PRISMA method using data sources from Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar within the 2015–2025 period. A total of 30 articles that met the inclusion criteria were analyzed thematically. The findings indicate that conflicts in primary schools are predominantly characterized by interpersonal conflicts, bullying, and communication misunderstandings, which impact students’ mental health. Conflict management approaches identified in the literature include disciplinary, restorative, and mediation-based approaches. School-based mediation has been shown to be effective in enhancing social-emotional skills, empathy, and peaceful conflict resolution. However, most existing studies are still focused on Western contexts and lack integration with local socio-cultural values. This study contributes by providing a comprehensive mapping of conflict issues in primary schools and a synthesis of the theoretical framework of SBM as a foundation for developing context-based conflict management models. Keywords: Conflict Management, Primary School, School-Based Mediation, Mental Health, Systematic Literature Review.References
Olweus, D. (2013). School bullying: Development and some important challenges. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 9, 751–780.
World Health Organization. (2021). Guidelines on mental health and psychosocial well-being among children and adolescents. Geneva: WHO Press.
Herawati, H., et al. (2024). Implementasi parenting di SD Islam Terpadu Kota Banda Aceh. Journal of Education Science (JES), 10(2), 33–4
Herawati, H., & Hayati, N. (2022). Peran ayah dalam parenting Islami terhadap perkembangan sosial-emosional anak sekolah dasar. Journal of Education Science (JES), 8(2), 15–25.
Herawati, H., et al. (2021). Perkembangan jiwa anak dalam perspektif pendidikan Islam di sekolah dasar. Journal of Education Science (JES), 7(1), 20–30.
Hymel, S., & Swearer, S. M. (2015). Four decades of research on school bullying: An introduction. American Psychologist, 70(4), 293–299.
Idris, J., & Herawati, H. (2019). Manajemen konflik bernuansa Islami di sekolah dasar ramah anak Kota Lhokseumawe. Palita: Journal of Social Religion Research, 4(1), 73–90.
Sawyer, M. G., et al. (2012). The mental health of young people. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 16(3), 45–58.
Skiba, R. J., & Peterson, R. L. (2000). School discipline at a crossroads. Exceptional Children, 66(3), 335–346.
Gregory, A., et al. (2017). Restorative practices in schools. Journal of Educational Psychology, 27(2), 120–142.
Jones, S. M., & Bouffard, S. M. (2012). Social and emotional learning in schools. Social Policy Report, 26(4), 1–33.
Cohen, R. (2005). Students resolving conflict: Peer mediation in schools. Good Year Books.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2005). Teaching students to be peacemakers. Interaction Book Company.
Morrison, B. (2012). Restoring safe school communities. Federation Press.
Tilaar, H. A. R. (2012). Perubahan sosial dan pendidikan. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Publication Ethics and Publication Malpractice Statement
This statement clarifies ethical behaviour of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in our journals, including the authors, the editors, the peer-reviewers and the publisher (Directorate Research and Community Service, Universitas Ubudiyah Indonesia).
Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication
The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed JES is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the authors, the journal editors, the peer reviewers, the publisher and the society.
Directorate Research and Community Service, Universitas Ubudiyah Indonesia (UUI) as publisher of this Journal takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing extremely seriously and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions.
Publication decisions
The editors of the journals are responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.
Fair play
An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.
Confidentiality
The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.
Disclosure and conflicts of interest
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.
