PENYELESAIAN PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA RINGAN PADA TINGKAT GAMPONG MELALUI PENERAPAN RESTORATIVE JUSTICE
Abstract
Penelitian ini tentang proses penyelesaian perkara tindak pidana ringan pada tingkat gampong dengan mekanisme penerapan restorative justice. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penyelesaian perkara tindak pidana ringan pada tingkat gampong dapat diselesaikan melalui penerapan restorative justice. Sebelum adanya aturan mengenai kebijakan restorative justice, di Aceh telah mengenal peradilan adat gampong yang berpedoman pada Qanun Aceh No. 10 Tahun 2008 tentang Pembinaan Kehidupan Adat Istiadat. Penerapan restorative justice pada perkara tindak pidana ringan pada tingkat gampong tidak terlepas dari ketentuan qanun tersebut. Proses penyelesaian perkara tindak pidana ringan pada tingkat gampong dengan penerapan restorative justice dilakukan secara transparan, adil, dan tanpa paksaan. Penyelesaian perkara dengan penerapan restorative justice, lebih memperhatikan kondisi korban, dimana pelaku bertanggung jawab dalam proses pemulihan korban untuk kembali kepada keadaan semula.
Kata Kunci ; Restorative Justice, Tindak Pidana Ringan, Penyelesaian Perkara.
This research is about the process of resolving minor criminal cases at the village level using the mechanism for implementing restorative justice. The results of the research show that the resolution of minor criminal cases at the village level can be resolved through the application of restorative justice. Before there were regulations regarding restorative justice policies, in Aceh there was familiar gampong customary justice which was guided by Aceh Qanun No. 10 of 2008 concerning the Development of Traditional Life. The application of restorative justice in minor criminal cases at the gampong level cannot be separated from the provisions of the qanun. The process of resolving minor criminal cases at the gampong level by implementing restorative justice is carried out transparently, fairly and without coercion. Resolving cases by applying restorative justice pays more attention to the victim's condition, where the perpetrator is responsible for the victim's recovery process to return to their original condition.
Keywords ; Restorative Justice, Minor Crimes, Case Settlement.
Downloads
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors can separately make additional contractual arrangements for non-exclusive distribution published by the journal (e.g., publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are allowed and encouraged to send their work via online (e.g., in the institutional repositories or their website) after published by the journal.
Publication Ethics
Journal of Low and Government Science (JLGS) has high standards for expected ethical behavior by all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer and the publisher. JLGSis a peer-reviewed journal, published three times a year by Faculty of Law Universitas Ubudiyah Indonesia. It is available online as open access sources as well as in print. This statement clarifies ethical behavior of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in this journal, including the author, the editor-in-chief, the Editorial Board, the reviewer, and the publisher. This statement is based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.
Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication
The publication of an article in JLGS is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific methods. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the editor, the reviewer, the publisher, and the society. As the publisher of JLGS takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing seriously and it recognizes its ethical and other responsibilities. JLGS committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions.
Publication Decisions
The editors of JLGS are responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The editors may be guided by the policies of JLGS editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers in making publication decisions.
Fair Play
An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.
Confidentiality
The editors and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.
Disclosure and conflicts of Interest
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.
