TINGKAT PEMAHAMAN MAHASISWA HUKUM TERHADAP SUMBER-SUMBER HUKUM ACARA PIDANA DI INDONESIA
Abstract
Abstrak
Sumber-sumber hukum acara pidana memegang peranan penting dalam membentuk kerangka hukum yang mengatur proses peradilan pidana di Indonesia ataupun sumber-sumber hukum acara pidana merupakan fondasi penting bagi mahasiswa hukum dalam memahami sistem peradilan pidana di Indonesia. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengukur tingkat pemahaman mahasiswa hukum terhadap berbagai sumber hukum acara pidana, termasuk Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP), peraturan pelaksana, yurisprudensi, dan doktrin. Metode yang digunakan adalah pendekatan kuantitatif deskriptif dengan instrumen kuesioner yang disebarkan kepada mahasiswa dari berbagai jenjang semester. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa meskipun KUHAP dipahami secara umum oleh mayoritas responden, pemahaman terhadap sumber hukum lainnya masih tergolong rendah. Kondisi ini mencerminkan adanya kesenjangan dalam literasi hukum yang perlu ditanggapi melalui metode pembelajaran yang lebih menyeluruh, kontekstual, dan berbasis pengalaman langsung. Partisipasi mahasiswa dalam kegiatan akademik seperti moot court, klinik hukum, dan forum diskusi terbimbing terbukti berdampak positif terhadap peningkatan pemahaman tersebut. Dengan demikian, pengembangan metode pengajaran hukum acara pidana yang lebih aktif dan aplikatif menjadi sangat penting agar mahasiswa tidak hanya memahami teori secara tekstual, tetapi juga mampu menerapkannya dalam praktik hukum yang sesungguhnya.
Kata Kunci: Tingkat Pemahaman, Mahasiswa Hukum, Hukum Acara Pidana
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors can separately make additional contractual arrangements for non-exclusive distribution published by the journal (e.g., publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are allowed and encouraged to send their work via online (e.g., in the institutional repositories or their website) after published by the journal.
Publication Ethics
Journal of Low and Government Science (JLGS) has high standards for expected ethical behavior by all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer and the publisher. JLGSis a peer-reviewed journal, published three times a year by Faculty of Law Universitas Ubudiyah Indonesia. It is available online as open access sources as well as in print. This statement clarifies ethical behavior of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in this journal, including the author, the editor-in-chief, the Editorial Board, the reviewer, and the publisher. This statement is based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.
Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication
The publication of an article in JLGS is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific methods. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the editor, the reviewer, the publisher, and the society. As the publisher of JLGS takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing seriously and it recognizes its ethical and other responsibilities. JLGS committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions.
Publication Decisions
The editors of JLGS are responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The editors may be guided by the policies of JLGS editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers in making publication decisions.
Fair Play
An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.
Confidentiality
The editors and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.
Disclosure and conflicts of Interest
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.
