PROSES PENYELESAIAN PERKARA DILUAR PENGADILAN MELALUI PENDEKATAN RESTORATIVE JUSTICE DAN ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION
Abstrak
Penelitian ini tentang proses penyelesaian perkara diluar pengadilan melalui pendekatan restorative justice dan alternatif dispute resolution. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penyelesaian perkara diluar pengadilan melalui pendekatan restorative justice digunakan untuk perkara pidana, sementara pendekatan alternatif dispute resolution lebih banyak digunakan dalam penyelesaian perkara perdata. Dalam penyelesaian perkara melalui restorative justice lebih menekankan pemulihan korban dengan memberikan pemenuhan hak-hak korban, dimana mengharuskan pelaku untuk bertanggung jawab. Sementara dalam penyelesaian perkara diluar pengadilan melalui pendekatan alternatif dispute resolution lebih kepada penyelesaian dalam hal kesepakatan bersama, dimana para pihak yang bersengketa merumuskan sendiri penyelesaian yang mereka kehendaki dengan perantara atau bantuan mediator/negosiator.
Kata Kunci: Restorative Justice, Alternative Dispute Resolution.
Â
This research is about the process of resolving cases outside of court using a restorative justice approach and alternative dispute resolution. The research results show that resolving cases outside of court using a restorative justice approach is used for criminal cases, while the alternative dispute resolution approach is more widely used in resolving civil cases. In resolving cases through restorative justice, the emphasis is placed on restoring victims by providing fulfillment of victims' rights, which requires perpetrators to be held accountable. Meanwhile, resolving cases outside of court through an alternative dispute resolution approach is more about settlement in terms of mutual agreement, where the disputants formulate the resolution they want themselves through a mediator/negosiator.
Keywords: Restorative Justice, Alternative Dispute Resolution.
Unduhan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Authors who publish this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors can separately make additional contractual arrangements for non-exclusive distribution published by the journal (e.g., publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are allowed and encouraged to send their work via online (e.g., in the institutional repositories or their website) after published by the journal.
Publication Ethics
Journal of Low and Government Science (JLGS) has high standards for expected ethical behavior by all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer and the publisher. JLGSis a peer-reviewed journal, published three times a year by Faculty of Law Universitas Ubudiyah Indonesia. It is available online as open access sources as well as in print. This statement clarifies ethical behavior of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in this journal, including the author, the editor-in-chief, the Editorial Board, the reviewer, and the publisher. This statement is based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.
Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication
The publication of an article in JLGS is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific methods. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the editor, the reviewer, the publisher, and the society. As the publisher of JLGS takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing seriously and it recognizes its ethical and other responsibilities. JLGS committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions.
Publication Decisions
The editors of JLGS are responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The editors may be guided by the policies of JLGS editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers in making publication decisions.
Fair Play
An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.
Confidentiality
The editors and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.
Disclosure and conflicts of Interest
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.
