KEJAHATAN GENOSIDA DALAM KASUS ROHINGYA MYANMAR DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM INTERNASIONAL
Abstract
Perlakuan diskriminasi selama ini dialami oleh etnis minoritas Rohingya di Myanmar akibat kebijakan dan tindakan dari Pemerintah Myanmar. Berangkat dari latar belakang tersebut, penulis bermaksud untuk mengetahui pengaturan terhadap perlakuan diskriminatif terhadap suatu etnik tertentu dalam hukum internasional. Secara lebih spesifik, tulisan ini juga bertujuan untuk menganalisis bentuk sanksi hukum internasional kepada Myanmar atas perlakuan diskriminatif tersebut. dan mengetahui dan menganalisa upaya yang dapat dilakukan dalam menyelesaikan kasus pelanggaran HAM berat yaitu genosida terhadap etnis rohingya di Myanmar berdasarkan hukum internasional. Tindakan salah secara internasional maka negara Myanmar telah melanggar kewajiban internasional dalam melindungi kepentingan masyarakat internasional dimana dalam hal tersebut tedapatnya pelanggaran berat atas kewajiban internasional dalam memelihara perdamaian dan keamanan internasional. Sebagai bentuk pertanggungjawaban atas terjadinya pelanggaran HAM maka negara mempunyai tanggungjawab untuk menyelesaikan kasus yang terjadi di negaranyaÂ
Kata Kunci : HAM Berat yaitu genosida, Penyelesaian Kasus Rohingya , Hukum Internasional
Â
Discriminatory treatment has suffered minority ethnic of Rohingya in Myanmar caused by the policy and action of Burmese government. This background inspires the author to identify the relevant international laws applied to discriminatory treatment against a particular ethnic. More specifically, this article is also aimed to analyze the form of international law sanction to be imposed on Myanmar for the discriminatory treatmentin concern. And find out and analyse the efforts that can be made in resolving the cases of severe Human rights violations against is genocida the ethnic rohingya in Myanmar based on international law. That Myanmar government has commited international wrongfull act by neglecting its international obligations in protecting international community’s interest toward international peace and security.
Keywords: Gross violation of human rights is genocida, The settlement of the case Rohingya, International Law
Downloads
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors can separately make additional contractual arrangements for non-exclusive distribution published by the journal (e.g., publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are allowed and encouraged to send their work via online (e.g., in the institutional repositories or their website) after published by the journal.
Publication Ethics
Journal of Low and Government Science (JLGS) has high standards for expected ethical behavior by all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer and the publisher. JLGSis a peer-reviewed journal, published three times a year by Faculty of Law Universitas Ubudiyah Indonesia. It is available online as open access sources as well as in print. This statement clarifies ethical behavior of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in this journal, including the author, the editor-in-chief, the Editorial Board, the reviewer, and the publisher. This statement is based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.
Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication
The publication of an article in JLGS is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific methods. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the editor, the reviewer, the publisher, and the society. As the publisher of JLGS takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing seriously and it recognizes its ethical and other responsibilities. JLGS committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions.
Publication Decisions
The editors of JLGS are responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The editors may be guided by the policies of JLGS editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers in making publication decisions.
Fair Play
An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.
Confidentiality
The editors and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.
Disclosure and conflicts of Interest
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.
